Characters

Fields of Mistria Characters Ages: What Is Known

Direct answer

No numeric Fields of Mistria characters ages are provided in the collected wiki sources. The available profile substitute is a birthday season and day, plus a sometimes-flattened single-status field for several villagers, but neither can be converted into a canon age. Any numeric age chart based on appearance, occupation, romance eligibility, or fan estimates is therefore Pending verification (待确认). [S1][S2]

Last verified 2026-08-16Evidence status: Ready

At a glance

Quick Facts

Quick facts for Fields of Mistria Characters Ages: What Is Known
Numeric agesNot provided in the collected sources
Usable profile datesConfirmed birthday season and day for the listed villagers
Dating evidence8 hearts, weekend dates, and one date per partner per week are mechanics, not ages
Evidence boundaryAppearance, occupation, romance status, and fan estimates cannot establish a canon age

Do this first

Fastest path

  1. Use the confirmed birthday season and day as the character's profile date.
  2. Keep relationship status and dating rules in their own fields instead of converting them into an age.
  3. Mark every numeric age chart as Pending verification (待确认) until a source states an explicit age.

Detailed guide

Why there is no canon age table here

The captured current wiki page redirects Villagers to Characters and does not expose an age field. The Fandom capture supplies birthdays and some relationship-status labels, but it also contains no number of years for the villagers. With both sources missing numeric ages, a definitive list cannot be produced from this material. [S1][S2]

A missing field is different from proof that every character is the same age or that ages do not exist anywhere in game dialogue. It only means the sources collected for this keyword do not establish the numbers. This article answers the search directly by preserving that gap instead of turning visual impressions into false canon. [S1][S2]

Confirmed birthday data

The clearly captured birthday rows are Adeline on Winter 18, Balor on Summer 10, Caldarus on Spring 25, Celine on Summer 14, Eiland on Summer 20, Hayden on Winter 8, Juniper on Fall 26, March on Spring 16, Reina on Fall 12, Ryis on Spring 4, Seridia on Winter 2, and Valen on Fall 1. A birthday identifies a recurring celebration date, not a birth year. None of those season-and-day values supports calculating how old the character is. [S2]

Birthday data can still help with profile pages and gifting plans because it tells the player when a villager's annual date occurs. It should be labeled as birthday information rather than placed under a numeric age heading. Adding a guessed year to a confirmed birthday would combine one real fact with one unsupported claim and make the result misleading. [S2]

Why appearance is not evidence

Character portraits can suggest a life stage to a viewer, but the collected sources do not translate art style into years of age. Pixel art, seasonal outfits, occupations, height impressions, and facial features are presentation choices rather than numeric profile fields in this evidence. No age is assigned from how young or old a character looks. [S1][S2]

The same restriction applies to personality and responsibilities. Being a blacksmith, merchant, doctor, noble, or ancient dragon does not establish one human-style age number unless a source states it. Caldarus in particular demonstrates why species and story context make visual age guesses especially unreliable. [S1][S2]

Relationship status does not prove age

The flattened Fandom table marks several villagers as single, including Adeline, Eiland, Hayden, Juniper, March, Reina, Ryis, Seridia, and Valen. Some neighboring rows for Balor, Caldarus, and Celine do not align the single-status field clearly enough to reproduce as a definitive table. In either case, a single label describes relationship availability and does not reveal a number of years. [S2]

Romance eligibility also cannot be used as an age calculator. The source's dating mechanics describe an 8-heart threshold, weekend dates, and one date per partner per week, which are gameplay rules rather than biographical age data. This page keeps those systems separate so a mechanical requirement is not mistaken for a canon profile statement. [S2]

What the captured dating data says

The Fandom capture says dating begins after reaching 8 hearts with a single villager. It describes dates as available on weekends and limits them to one date per partner per week. It also says a first date provides a photo card and that Date Inspiration Items unlock further date types. [S2]

Those details may answer an age-adjacent concern about who can be dated, but they do not answer how old anyone is. The table formatting is also partially flattened, so exact alignment should be checked in the current game before building a complete candidate database. Including the mechanics here is useful only when their non-age status remains explicit. [S2]

Claims that remain pending verification

Every exact numeric age remains Pending verification (待确认) under the supplied material. Fan charts, social posts, or estimates may be interesting discussion, but they would need a traceable official statement, explicit dialogue, or verified current database entry before appearing as fact. This standard applies even when multiple fans repeat the same estimate. [S1][S2]

The incomplete alignment of the birthday and single-status table is a separate limitation. Birthdays whose rows are clear can be published as birthdays, while ambiguous status cells should not be silently attached to the nearest name. Preserving the uncertainty is more accurate than producing a visually complete but unsupported chart. [S2]

How to cite character profiles safely

Use the character's name, confirmed birthday, role, and explicitly stated relationship status when those fields are readable. Label numeric age as unknown unless the source itself provides a number, and never convert a birthday into years without a birth year. Keep dating rules in a mechanics section rather than using them to imply biography. [S1][S2]

This approach produces a less dramatic answer, but it is the only one supported by the collected evidence. It also prevents an SEO page from laundering a fan assumption into apparent canon through repetition. If an official age source is collected later, the affected profiles can be updated with that citation rather than rewriting guesses as corrections. [S1][S2]

Conditions and exceptions

Version, conditions & exceptions

The collected profile captures do not specify a game version for numeric ages; recheck future official profile data before publishing an age chart.

Last verified 2026-08-16. The collected evidence is ready for this page's stated scope.

Evidence trail

Sources & last verified

This page is limited to the collected sources below. Source conflicts, missing image data, and version-sensitive details remain labeled instead of being filled with guesses.

Last verified: 2026-08-16

Continue exploring

Evidence pack processed August 15, 2026 · Page updated 2026-08-16